Peer-Review

This journal operates a double anonymized review process. All contributions will
be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed
suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert
reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible
for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's
decision is final. Editors are not involved in decisions about papers which they
have written themselves or have been written by family members or colleagues
or which relate to products or services in which the editor has an interest.

Double Anonymized Review
This journal uses double anonymized review, which means the identities of the
authors are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa. To facilitate this,
please include the following separately: Title page (with author details): This
should include the title, authors' names, affiliations, acknowledgements and any
Declaration of Interest statement, and a complete address for the corresponding
author including an e-mail address. Anonymized manuscript (no author details):
The main body of the paper (including the references, figures, tables and any
acknowledgements) should not include any identifying information, such as the
authors' names or affiliations.